Abstract Panel


Authors Information
SequenceTypeName TitleFirst NameLast NameDepartmentInstitute / Affiliation
1 Author Dr. Meng Tan Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology Chinese Academy of Social Science
Abstract Information
TrackID
:
IUAES23_ABS_H5221
Abstract Theme
:
PT147 - Chinese Scholars : Perspectives on World Anthropology
Abstract Title
:
An Ethnographic Study on the Knowledge Genealogy of China’s Overseas Ethnography:Initiative, Dialogue, and Community
Short Abstract
:
This paper investigates the knowledge genealogy of China's Overseas Ethnography, drawing on participant observation and interviews with researchers in the field over the last two decades. Rather than tracking historical changes, the study examines the role and form of dialogue among researchers with diverse disciplinary, national, and cultural identities, aimed at reflecting the discourse dynamics between Northern and Southern academia and the global knowledge community from the perspective of Chinese Anthropological transformation.
Long Abstract
:

Disciplinary history serves as an essential foundation for scientific research, as it embodies the ideologies and orientations of academic communities. However, the current World Anthropological history predominantly focuses on perspectives from the North and the West, thus neglecting the need for a multi-centered development of Anthropology in diverse contexts. In this context, China's overseas ethnography - a new track amongst Chinese and World Anthropology - provides a unique lens to observe interactions between the 'Chinese experience and global vision'. This is due to its isomorphic relationships with Chinese social sciences and global knowledge networks and its role as a reflective prism that reveals the intersection between 'knowledge production and identity construction.' This paper centers on the knowledge genealogy of China’s overseas ethnography, reflecting on the changes and transformations the field has undergone over the past two decades. As an ethnographic presentation of specific practices in academic history, it investigates the role of personal initiative, cross-border dialogue, and communal interaction in influencing these changes. Using network analysis and examining the communicative practices associated with China's overseas ethnography, this study draws connections between Chinese Anthropology and global Anthropologies,explores the reasons and impetus for such structures and transformations, provides a new perspective on the discourse dynamics between Northern, Southern academia and the global knowledge community.

Abstract Keywords
:
China's Overseas Ethnography; Knowledge Genealogy; Academic Discourse