Abstract Panel


Authors Information
SequenceTypeName TitleFirst NameLast NameDepartmentInstitute / Affiliation
1 Author Mr. Muhammed Rafi social work kalasalingam academy of research and education
Abstract Information
TrackID
:
IUAES23_ABS_K9449
Abstract Theme
:
P021 - Governance, Development, and Informality: Social Practices and Everyday Knowledge in the Global South
Abstract Title
:
Mapping the indigenous aspirations of development-looking beyond the state narratives
Short Abstract
:
Development and urbanisation of indigenious communities is marked by dispossession of their land and resources, through the state policy initiatives, which causes damage to life, livelihood, social and ecnomic fabrics of the community, which has been given less weight in the policy concerns. Keeping these contexts, the paper examines and re?ects the issues of relocation of adivasi community of Kerala in the name of development and urbanisation, how policy fails to be inclusive and sustainable and also discuss way forward.
Long Abstract
:

<p>The adivasis of Kerala historically remained outside of developmental yardstick of the &lsquo;Kerala model development&rsquo;. Despite the constitutional and legal protection, adivasis still lag behind as beneficiaries of the development model. This has led to many conflicts between state and adivasis in Kerala. It, thus demands conscientious attention to reshape state&rsquo;s planning and development to be inclusive to indigenous people. The relocation of adivasis from Wayanad wildlife sanctuary is recent example on that. In order to understand that bridging gap between that this paper used method of understanding adivasis voice to deconstruct colonial discourses through the ethnographic method. The colonial knowledge characterized indigenous people as primitive, old and incorrect people, rather understanding their realities and life. Thus, in this consideration, it is very important to decolonize the methodologies which were exercised only on coherent narratives. The Linda Tuhiwai Smith&rsquo;s concept of <em>Decolonizing Methodologies</em> this regard is important, because this methodological underpinning aimed to deconstruct colonial methodologies used as a primary textual reference in adopting methodologies during the field work. Therefore, this paper analyses how the state&rsquo;s planning of conservation fails to understand adivasi aspirations, how the protective provisions of constitution and other legal safeguards sabotages in the name of conservation. The research looks different aspects how environmentalist&rsquo;s perception of conservation, government&rsquo;s perception of development and adivasis see resources and their difference. The research will explicate each of their perceptions in arriving at points of convergence and divergence. Therefore, it will trace how adivasi livelihoods are articulated by them and by the exclusionary regime (state, corporate/private and market) through different forms of appropriation with reference to the Kattunayakan community (PVTG), Wayanad wildlife sanctuary, Kerala.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>

Abstract Keywords
:
Relocation, constitutional and legal rights, land alienation.